Automation
πŸ”€

Make.com vs n8n 2026: Cloud vs Self-Hosted Automation Compared

n8n is the open-source challenger to Make.com. We compare both on power, pricing, privacy, and who each one is really built for.

Alex Morgan

Alex Morgan

June 1, 2026 Β· 9 min read

Last updated: June 1, 2026

πŸ“š Part of the Complete Make.com Guide 2026

Make.com vs n8n: Quick Summary

Make.com is a fully managed cloud platform β€” sign up and automate in minutes with no infrastructure to manage. n8n is open-source and self-hostable β€” free if you run it yourself, but requires technical setup. For most people and businesses, Make.com is the better choice. For developers who prioritise data privacy and want unlimited workflows at zero cost, n8n is compelling.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FeatureMake.comn8nWinner
HostingCloud (managed)Self-hosted or cloudDepends on need
Free option1,000 ops/month freeSelf-host = unlimited freen8n (if technical)
Paid cloud pricingFrom $10.59/moFrom $20/moMake.com
Integrations1,500+ native400+ native + any via HTTPMake.com
Visual builderExcellent canvas UIGood node-based editorMake.com
Code supportLimited (functions)Full JavaScript executionn8n
Data privacyYour data on Make serversSelf-hosted = your serversn8n
Setup timeMinutesHours (self-hosted)Make.com
CommunityLarge, active forumsStrong developer communityTie

When n8n Is the Better Choice

Data privacy requirements: If your workflows handle sensitive data (medical records, financial data, GDPR-sensitive information), self-hosting n8n means your data never leaves your servers.

Unlimited automation for free: n8n's self-hosted version is completely free with no execution limits. For developers and teams with the infrastructure to run it, this is exceptional value.

You need code: n8n allows full JavaScript execution within workflows, making it far more flexible for complex data transformations that require actual programming logic.

When Make.com Is the Better Choice

You're not technical: Make.com requires zero infrastructure knowledge. Create an account and you're automating in minutes. n8n's self-hosted setup requires Docker knowledge, server management, and ongoing maintenance.

You need broad integrations: Make.com's 1,500+ native integrations cover far more apps than n8n's 400+. If your stack includes niche SaaS tools, Make.com is more likely to have a native connector.

You want reliability without ops: Make.com handles uptime, scaling, updates, and error recovery. Self-hosted n8n puts that responsibility on you.

The Verdict

For the vast majority of businesses, Make.com is the practical choice: easier, faster, and with better integrations at a low monthly cost. n8n is excellent for developers and organisations with specific data privacy needs who have the technical capacity to manage their own infrastructure.

Full Make.com review β†’ | Complete Make.com Guide β†’

About the Author

Alex Morgan

Alex Morgan

Senior AI Tools Analyst

5+ years reviewing AI tools. Former software engineer. 30-day hands-on testing on every review.